Sections 498 (Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 337A (i), (ii), 337 F (II), 452, 148 and 149 of Shuja jah I Khafifah and Shajjah i Madihah) and the arrest warrant before the domestic plea, on both sides. Grant alleges that they hurt each other, resulting in five people being injured by the accused and two from the complainant's side. ), PPC, while the accused's mother-in-law had a fracture of the left-hand radius that was suppressed by the complainant by the realist, so far as the involvement of the accused in other criminal cases is concerned. Yes, the complainant's lawyer failed to prove the dispute because the accused was not convicted in any of the above cases, the broader net was thrown by the complainant so that he could be more involved in the matter. Add more people. The complainant did not come to the court with clear hands when he was involved in the investigation, especially when he suppressed the victim's wounds, especially when he joined the investigation. Crime cannot be recovered, under the circumstances, adoption should be adopted to affect recovery. And police could not be allowed to adopt third-degree methods to produce evidence. The accused's case does not fall under the prohibition clause of section 497, the pre-arrest warrant for the CCPAd advertisement was already given to the accused, it has been confirmed in r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
