Sections 27, 41 and 52 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), section 12 pre-sale agreements for the specific performance of Les Pendens, by applying the principle of sale to the seller of the suit land for sale by the vendor in favor of. Under this, the first contract has lost its legal utility due to the expiry of the fixed term for discharge by the claimant. And because he was in need of money, he sold the suit to the trial court after the trial, but then the appellate court of the seller dismissed the appeal, after which he bought the suit with good intentions. ? Accuracy Vendor did not refuse to enforce the sale agreement in favor of the claimant, without taking into consideration the first sale agreement in favor of the plaintiff. Subsequently, the seller did not raise such a request in the written statement, nor did he make any such allegation in the examination except when he had inquired of the seller through the seller in favor of the sale agreement. Registration of the Sub Registrar's Office did not disclose this effect until the subsequent seller entered into a subsequent sale agreement. He tried to contact the plaintiff that the person affected by the laissez-faire principle could not object to keeping the case, especially when the vendor did not challenge the trial court's order. Court dismisses second appeal
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
