Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus THE STATE


The petitioner had a vacant hand on the demand for a gun after a lat license for police officers on bail and sitting with the Section 498 Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) and no clear action was taken against it. Not done
1974 P Cr. L J 570

[Lahore]

Before Saleem Mazhar, J

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ-Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 4023/B of 1973, decided on 15th October 1973.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

-- S. 498-Bail-Persons sitting with petitioner tiring at, and killing a police officer on demand being made by latter of licences for guns possessed-Petitioner empty-handed and no overt act ascribed to him-Bail granted.

Riaz Kayani for Petitioner.

Nazir Ahmed Cheema for the State.

S. I. Khurshid Alain, S. H. O., alongwith Police Record.

ORDER

This is a petition for hail on behalf of Muhammad Rafique against whom and two others a case tinder section 302/353/34, P. P. C. was registered for the murder of Muhammad Sadiq A. S. I. The prosecution ease according to the F. I. R. is that the deceased A. S. I. was travelling in the bus and so was the petitioner and his two companions, namely; Muhammad Nawaz and Muhammad Ramzan who were armed with 12-bore guns. The petitioner was empty-banded and they were sitting on the same seat. The deceased demanded the licences from Muhammad Nawaz and Muhammad Ramzan and in the meantime the bus stopped and they alongwith the petitioner got down from the bus. The petitioner and Muhammad Ramzan co-accused were arrested at the spot after Ramzan and his companion Nawaz had fired at the deceased. No overt act has been ascribed to the petitioner and he was empty-handed as is clear from the perusal of the F. I. R.

2. The petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 20,000.00 (Rupees twenty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Enquiry Magistrate. The petition is disposed of accordingly.

3. Copy of the order be given dasti on usual fee.

Bail allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Dadu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.