SAJJAD HUSSAIN versus ADMINISTARATIVE JUDGE, PESHAWAR, HIGH COURT
Sections 3, 5, 10 and 11 North West Frontier Province Government Servants (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973, RR 4 and 5 Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974), Section 4 Appointed as an anti-terrorism court, his services were terminated after charging a charge sheet and investigating them on charges of stealing computers from the court premises, appellant's theft. The allegation was dropped simply because he was the last person to leave the courthouse. Appellant was acquitted of theft by a Judicial Magistrate, in the last preliminary inquiry by the Senior Civil Judge on the sole basis of departure from the Court, the appellant was liable for theft. Was a fact-finding inquiry, as it was not held under the rules of the Government Employees (Performance and Discipline) of the North West Frontier Province, 1973 or the removal of the Northwest Frontier Province Province (Special) (Options) Ordinance, 2000, and also under the authority's order no witnesses were reported in the record, While removing the articles / items from the court premises, no one had seen the appellant, in the absence of any other evidence, the only reason was that the appellant was the last to leave the court premises, not the other. Seems reasonable and will not be convinced that he should be subject to severe employment termination, especially when the authority expressed his concerns about his performance and conduct, which led to the Northwest's The border will become a victim of the province. Arden
