ZIARAT GUL versus CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS SOUTHERN CIRCLE, PESHAWAR
Sections 3 and 5 (3) of the Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974), section 4, imposing penalties on corruption and incompetence, the appellant was a driver who was associated with an official to operate a public vehicle. It was alleged that the vehicle was operating. The appellant had a short escape from the accident due to a break failure. Officially blamed the removal of nuts from the wheel of a car and charged that it was sabotage activity, or that an attempt at the life of government alleged acts would certainly come in praise of criminal acts, But no criminal complaint or FIR was lodged against the appellant / driver, nor was there any motive on the record in which the appellant resorted to such action to kill the senior government officer. Was. There was no evidence available for the risk that two fines, for indicating the appellant's involvement in the nuts removal, took a major penalty for the change in the bottom of which, under the appellant's (BPS 5) salary. The alert administration of the Cattle Roll was banned for being cautious in the future, with no penalties provided for the removal of the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000 in the Northwestern Frontier Province. , Nor the rules of the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) of the North West Frontier Province, were issued in 1973 after the appellant issued a show cause notice and conducted an investigation against him on allegations of corruption and incompetence. It was the authority of the concerned officer. The matter and the inquiry committee
