Find a Lawyer

MST. CHAND SANOOBER versus GHULAM NOORANI

In the case of a preliminary appointment to section 13, the notice of the student and the press and the student indicator, the proof of plant performance and the student's notice indicate that the plaintiff found out about the sale of his uncle's home suit, where he sought the petitioner and Did not present the defendant as a plaintiff. There are witnesses to the plea and performance of such tabs, but they were represented by a special counsel who dismissed the impact suit.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• UMAR DARAZ v. State 2011 PCrLJ 559
• Malik SUBA v. WAPDA through Chairman WAPDA Lahore 2011 MLD 560
• FAIZ KHAN v. Haji MUHAMMAD ASHRAF 2011 CLC 563
• MUHAMMAD RAUF v. KHURSHID ALAM 2011 CLC 570
• AMEER ZAMAN v. HABIBULLAH KHAN 2011 MLD 582
• MUHAMMAD AMIN v. IBRAHIM 2011 CLC 589
• Mst. ANILA v. Mst. RAFIA 2011 YLR 593
• Mrs. RANIA IBRAHIM QURESHI v. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, ABBOTTABAD 2011 PCrLJ 594

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

top advocate from Kurram Agency lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes