Section 497 (2) Narcotic Substance Act (XVV of 1997), Section 9 (C) drug bail possession and smuggling, grant of further inquiry records showed that marijuana was not recovered from the direct custody of the accused. Knowledge of the presence of prohibited persons on the roof of the Hui Bus; and for this purpose, they exchanged their information; a question that would be determined after recording the evidence was that the presence of the accused persons, such as the bus. The driver and cleaner were not enough to stop the culprits responsible for smuggling the exported ban. The fact was a factual dispute, the recording of evidence was needed and so was the matter of further investigation, the accused, who was in lockup from 26/2010/2010 on the date of his arrest, was thoroughly questioned, Investigations against them were completed, they would remain in custody. The prosecution has no beneficial purpose, so that in the absence of reasonable grounds to link the accused to the commission of the crime, their case is a further investigation, considering their request for release on their bail. Was suitable for Under the circumstances, the bail may have been released
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
