Article 8 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 and 247 Constitutional Petitions Reflecting on the Controversy The High Court of Scope Petitioner's constitutional jurisdiction alleged that the National Highway Authority had acquired the rest of the property through illegal and illegal acquisition of land. Damaged which has been changed in the approved plan. The approach road and the applicant's access to the main road were prevented, causing irreparable damage to his property and he said that the applicant and his family were eligible for changes to the approved road design. Family life is at stake The applicant's claim was a factual dispute, which cannot be considered nor considered by the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. , Such questions can only be answered by the parties' evidence and the opponent's record after a proper investigation of the facts, Was outside the jurisdiction of the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction of such a practice, it is desirable that a competent court have full jurisdiction in this matter, even otherwise, the applicant's tribal areas Was a resident and the matter relates to the tribal areas in relation to Article 247 (7) of the Constitution and its jurisdiction has been banned. In connection with the applicant's grievance redressal, the Supreme Court and the High Court were working under the Frontier Crimes Regulations, 1901, to settle the applicant's complaint, which had a special jurisdiction over the matter, Was born due to conflict and is undesirable. Scope
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
