Appeal against acquittal of Section 302/109/34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A) bail granted by suspicion, delayed and delayed the reporting of the case by approximately five hours. For clarity, in the FIR as well as in its statement that the complainant's explanation given by the complainant in connection with the delay has been disputed, it cannot be considered reasonable and it can be submitted that The complaining party wasted this time in consultation and the alleged complainant was the victim's father, while the prosecutor's witness was the nephew of the complainant. In these circumstances, according to their testimony, should be examined with proper care and caution, the presence of eyewitnesses on the spot and the complainant thought that Kalashnikov had not been recovered. The suspects were made out of possession, but they were seized when they were found in the forensic reports of the Franzic Science Laboratory because they were not credible. The users' case was not a case, but other FIR-C reports were not supporting the report prosecution case within 24 hours. The defendant's confessional statement was not recorded, which recorded the confessional statement, In his interim examination, he admitted that after recording the confession offense, the accused was handed over to the same investigating officer, who presented the confessional statement to him, called the confessional statement, without any further evidence. This was not confirmed by the source, such as a confessional statement that would result in legal instability. And, from these
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
