Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HAFIZ NIAZ MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), S. 498 One of the bail-murder cases was attributed to him by a blind man and only Lalakar and the other accused during a few months above the age of sixteen. Young Boy Counter Case Section 325 also filed a complaint against the complaining party, which has two versions, that the question is whether the accused has proved guilty of death or transport which is not yet established. Can be executed under circumstances (XLV of 1860), section 302

1973 P Cr. L J 391

[Lahore]

Before Ataullah Sajjad, J

Hafiz NIAZ MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER----Petitioners

versus

THE STATE----Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2902/B of 1971, decided on 20th December 1971.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

, S 498-Bail-Murder case-One of accused a blind man and only lalkara attributed to him and other accused a young boy few months above sixteen years-Coun ter-case S. 325 also registered against complainant party for causing injuries to accused-Case having two versions, question whether accused committed offence punishable with death or trans portation for life yet to be established-Bail granted in circum stances-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302.

Saeedur Rehman Khan with Mian Muhammad Akhtar for Petitioners.

Rashid Aziz for the State.

ORDER

It appears from the perusal of the First Information Report that both the parties exchanged blows and it was during this exchange of blows that Anwar went into the house, brought out the gun and shot at Akhtar Ali. It is submitted that Hafiz Niaz Muhammad is a blind man and only a lalkara is attributed to him. It is further urged that Nisar Ahmad is a young boy although the learned counsel concedes that at the time of the commission of the offence he was a few months above sixteen years and the provision of proviso to section 497, Criminal Procedure Code will not be strictly available to him. It is further submitted that two women on the side of the accused were injured and there is no explanation for these injuries in the First Information Report. The learned counsel submits that a counter-case under section 325, Pakistan Penal Code has been registered against the complainant party for causing grievous injuries to Hafiz Niaz Muhammad. It is his contention that there being two versions in the case, it is yet to be established whether the two petitioners have committed an offence punishable with death or transportation for life.

2. The contentions have force. I direct that the petitioners shall be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees ten thousand) each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Multan.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.