Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FARMAN ALI SHAH versus THE STATE


The Criminal Code (CCPC) Section 498 child murder case was merely a call but no overt act was declared as a surety bail, but the permissible court was directed to consider the issue of cancellation of bail, if the applicants later I am found guilty of committing any kind.

1973 P Cr. L J 217

[Lahore]

Before Mushtaq Hussain Munir, J

FARMAN ALI SHAH AND 3 OTHERS-Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 768-B of 1971, decided on 7th May 1971.

Criminal Procedure. Code (V of 1898),

---S. 498-Ball-Murder case-Only proverbial lalkara but no overt act attributed to accused-Bail granted but committing Court directed to consider question of cancellation of bail, if petitioners subsequently found guilty of any overt acts.

Lal and another v. The State Criminal Appeal No. 106 of 1970 rel.

Ijaz Hussain Batalvi for Petitioners.

Abdus Samad Hashmi for the State.

ORDER

A case was registered under section 302 read with section 34, P. P. C. on 16-12-1970 at Garb Maharaja Police Station in connection with murder of one Abid Hussain who died in an occurrence, which took place in village Uch Gul Imam. The allegation against the accused was that one of them, namely Farman Ali Shah was armed with a gun and he fired at the deceased. His co-accused namely Sher-Ali Shah Imdad Ali Shah and Muhammad Taqi Shah were empty-handed. Only a Lalkara was attributed to them. No other overt act was assigned to them. Under the circumstances the petition with regard to Farman Ali Shah was dismissed and admitted with respect of the remaining three petitioners.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. In view of the fact that no overt act has been attributed to Sher Ali Shah, Imdad Ali Shah and Muhammad Taqi Shah and only a proverbial lalkara has been attributed to them, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 106 of 1970 (Lal and another v. The State) I allow their application and direct that they be released on bail in the sum of Rs. 20,000 (Twenty thousand) each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Jhang if however, during the course of the enquiry proceedings it is found, that the petitioners who were granted bail had been guilty of any overt act, it will be open to the Magistrate to consider the question of cancellation of their bail.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Khanbel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.