Section 9 (c) evidence of both drug possession, import or export and smuggling evidence was sent to the chemical expert who received a positive report that during the trial, the accused never challenged that the substance recovered. Was not intoxicating, sending the fully recovered material for analysis was not necessary, the investigation officer's submission will not be fatal in the case of the prosecution because all relevant material was presented to the court by all other witnesses. And there was enough evidence on record to prove the charges against the accused. The accused tried to prove their false interference in the case, but failed to explain their presence on the site, otherwise their presence was denied and their arrest was denied by the accused. That at that time they were engaged in hunting and when they heard the firing, they were lying on the ground to protect themselves and that they were falsely involved in the case. Had failed to land in the area; even they failed to show what they were hunting for and with what weapons, without The request for the defense of any weight, there can not be depended on, the accused has not demonstrated any animosity or hostility by officials of the Anti-Narcotic Force from people. The trial court, in which he was involved in the case, correctly evaluated the material on record and came to the conclusion that it was in accordance with the law to identify any illegal proceedings or irregularities by the accused trial court. Had failed
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
