Find a Lawyer

SAEED KHAN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 324/34 attempt to commit murder and general bail, approval of the case for further investigation, between the FIR / supplemental statements in the record of contradiction in the medical and ocular evidence. Clear contradictions were highlighted. Medico Legal Certificate issued in relation to injured victims According to FIR supplemental statement, the victim suffered fireworks injuries by the criminals on his right lower leg but according to the Medico legal document The same shooting was reported in connection with the. Such reception at his right lower leg was sufficient to caution the truth of the allegations made by the complaining party against the accused bail.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ATTIQUE v. State 2011 SCMR 1378
• MUHAMMAD YAHYA KHAN KULACHI v. REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE 2011 SCMR 1381
• DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, KASUR v. ZAHID ALI 2011 PLC(CS) 1382
• DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL INVESTIGATION, LAHORE v. ASGHAR ALI 2011 SCMR 1389
• SHAMSHAD ALI v. State 2011 SCMR 1394
• ARSHAD HUSSAIN v. State 2011 SCMR 1400
• DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOOD v. Mehr ASIF NADEEM 2011 SCMR 1403
• JAMSHAID ASMAT alias SHEEDU v. State 2011 SCMR 1405

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

advocates from Chacklala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes