Find a Lawyer

JUMMA versus STATE

Article 2 302 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article Accused (()) the defendant / applicant was sentenced to death on the statement of the complainant who was told that he was the sole witness but the evidence of such witness, which Said his witness did not appear. To be credible and credible, there was a conflict between molecular evidence and medical evidence. The evidence in this case needs to be re-evaluated.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MURAD BALOCH alias MICHEL v. State 2011 SCMR 1417
• Rana MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. AZMAT BASHIR 2011 SCMR 1420
• MUNIR HUSSAIN v. CHANGAZ KHAN 2011 SCMR 1424
• Prof. Dr. SHAMIM HASSAN, UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES v. Dr. WASEEM ABBAS ZAIDI 2011 SCMR 1426
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS SHEIKH v. SECRETARY/CHAIRMAN, MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS 2011 SCMR 1429
• NASEER v. KHUDA BAKHSH 2011 SCMR 1430
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (HEALTH), MANDI BAHAUDDIN 2011 SCMR 1433
• ASHFAQ AHMED v. State 2011 SCMR 1435

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

power of attorney advocate Mangowal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes