Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF ASIM versus SAJJAD AHMAD

Invoice of section 497 (2) and (5) of the Appellate Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/148/149 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) application for the cancellation of confrontation with armed and deadly weapons. The submission of two versions of the Investigation had already been finalized and the challan was presented to the court for trial. The police did not need to cover the accused on such occasions for investigative purposes, the prosecution said. There were two versions of the death of the victim, one by the complaining party and the other by the investigating agency that concluded after the trial against the accused. Update was admitted to bail in a court of inquiry almost two years ago and was not making any allegations about him any misuse or abuse of the discount on bail. Those were completely different to the approval of the bail and the cancellation of it.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• IRSHAD MUHAMMAD SHAH v. HESCO 2011 SCMR 1717
• KHALID MEHMOOD v. State 2011 SCMR 1719
• Mst. HAJIRAN v. INAYATULLAH 2011 SCMR 1720
• SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT LAHORE v. FAIZ AHMAD DOGAR 2011 SCMR 1722
• ABDUL SALAM v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 1727
• MUHAMMAD AMIN v. State 2011 SCMR 1736
• Dr. SHAHNAZ WAJID v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad 2011 SCMR 1737
• BASHER AHMED v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2011 SCMR 1742

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocates contact from Piaro goth lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes