Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus STATE

The date, time and place of arrest of the accused by the police in the second case of control26 Narcotic Sub-Maturity Act (XXV of 1997), section 9 (c) of the suspension of drug recovery conviction is not shown. The site plan did not even show that there were two routes to the recovery site. Both the suspects were sentenced to life imprisonment and were released on bail.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• Mst. HAJIRAN v. INAYATULLAH 2011 SCMR 1720
• SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT LAHORE v. FAIZ AHMAD DOGAR 2011 SCMR 1722
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF ASIM v. SAJJAD AHMAD 2011 SCMR 1725
• ABDUL SALAM v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 1727
• Dr. SHAHNAZ WAJID v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad 2011 SCMR 1737
• BASHER AHMED v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2011 SCMR 1742
• CUTTING OF TREES FOR CANAL WIDENING PROJECT, LAHORE 2011 SCMR 1743
• FAIZULLAH KHAN v. Haji ABDUL HAKEEM KHAN 2011 SCMR 1802

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Makran lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes