Find a Lawyer

COMMISSIONER (LEGAL) INLAND REVENUE, KARACHI versus DIGRI SUGAR MILLS LTD.

Article 133 (1) The High Court's reference jurisdiction was found to be inconvenient on the decision of the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, with regard to the controversial jurisdiction, and there was no question of law in the reference questions set forth in the High Court. There was no mistake or illegality to happen. The order of the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue Tribunal did not raise any specific question of law requiring any interference with the High Court reference jurisdiction under section 133 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, The scrutiny was limited. Appellate Tribunal may be born of an approved order which was rejected in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015

• Mst. SHAHNAZ alias JAHAN ARA v. Syed AHTISHAM ALI SHAH 2015 CLC 672
• Mst. LUBNA FARAH v. RAYMOND JAL HAP BYRAMJI 2015 MLD 674
• MUHAMMAD JAWAID KHAN v. Mst. ZOHRA 2015 MLD 679
• ABID ALI v. State 2015 YLR 685
• MANZOOR CHACHAR v. State 2015 PCrLJ 690
• BANK ALFALAH LIMITED v. CALLMATE TELIPS TELECOM LTD. 2015 CLD 691
• SHAHID HUSSAIN v. PREM KUMAR 2015 YLR 691
• ABDUL AZIZ NAREJO v. KARACHI PORT TRUST 2015 PLC(CS) 699

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2015 →

immigration advocates from Tall lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes