Find a Lawyer

IMTIAZ ALI versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Return of Employees under Article 184 Scheme, ex-gratia payment case initiated on the request of former employees of the bank as payment of additional amount to the rehabilitation employees, which constitutes 2343 employees under the Retirement Scheme for manual / non-knowledgeable employees. Regarding the rehabilitation of the employees of the bank and the management representatives of the bank negotiated for a settlement, under which the bank agreed to pay the surplus so that the re-employed employees made a prepayment. Representatives of retrench employees went to the Supreme Court for payment What not Additional compensation justified in terms of the offer offered by the bank was properly accepted and the re-employees will be paid additional pre-payment according to the terms of the offer.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary, Housing and Physical Planning, Peshawar v. Haji JAMSHER KHAN 2011 PLD 250
• Capt. (Retd.) KHALID ZAMAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Establishment Division 2011 PLC(CS) 251
• PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL, KARACHI WORKERS UNION v. MEMBER, N.I.R.C. 2011 SCMR 253
• POULTRY FEEDS CONTAINING PIG MEAT 2011 SCMR 255
• Ms. SALMA MOOSAJEE v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2011 SCMR 260
• Syed MUKHTAR HUSSAIN SHAH v. Mst. SABA IMTIAZ 2011 PLD 260
• M. ANWAR SIDHU v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2011 SCMR 261
• Miss ZUBAIDA KHATOON v. Mrs. TEHMINA SAJID SHEIKH 2011 SCMR 265

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

immigration advocates contact from Jehlum lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes