Article 4 Constitution Pakistan, Article 212 (3) National Bank of Pakistan Service Manager accused of misappropriation of Rs 2000, removal of appeal by Service Tribunal Validity Bank On several occasions, the appellant withdrew some accounts. Was. Without proper scrutiny, but was resubmitted. And that none of the account holders submitted during the inquiry in support of the provisional embezzlement bank could not deny that the appellant had a record of uninterrupted service for more than 26 years. No loss of personal interest or bank return has been mentioned by them in the frame charge sheet against. Different amounts of money from different accounts may temporarily sue the appellant for retention, but there is no finding that he has taken any personal gain or harmed the bank, if the appellant A copy of the inquiry report has been approved and personally provided with. After the hearing, he elaborated his actions / errors, which was not imposed on the appellant, was not proportional to the gravity of the allegation, did not demand the appellant's de novo inquiry or service. I was put aside by the restoration Supreme Court. From service and turned it into a mandatory retirement
