MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus VTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CENTRAL), KARACHI
Sections 15 (2) (ii) and 21 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3), in default of payment of rent of houses for the applicants / tenants, claimed that they had leased the landlords for the relevant period. Has agreed to rent. The landlord appeared in court and denied the claim about the payment of rent for the tenant's respective term that no receipt was offered for the payment of rent for the relevant period. Stated that the rent was modest, but did not say in the affirmative or negative that no receipt had been issued in the past. It was difficult for the tenants to accept the request that the landlords received the rent, but the High Court's refusal to issue a submission observation that the appellate court had concluded that the tenant, the lender, had rented for the relevant period. What was the default crime in payment. True, for both the fact and the law and no interference was required for the tenants, the Coun lawyer of the tenants could not go beyond the circumstances compelled to guarantee interference with such results and the appeal was dismissed for leave. Was
