Find a Lawyer

SALEEM ULLAH KHAN versus SHAHID HAMID

Respondents to the Section 9 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 184 and 190 Promotion intended to consider the applicant's case for development, despite the strict case and letter. And spiritually the Supreme Court passed. In the petition filed by the Federation, the Deputy Attorney General presented an agreement on the basis of which the order of the Supreme Court was dealt with and the respondents had to execute it. Was. Respondents were instructed to consider the applicant's case in a fair and equitable manner, in line with letter and spirituality when they were obliged to do so in Article 190 of the Conduct. Under which the application was dealt with.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MUHAMMAD AYAZ v. State 2011 SCMR 769
• GOVERNMENT OF NORTH-WEST FRONTIER PROVINCE through Secretary Agriculture, Live Stock and Cooperative v. ABDULLAH KHAN 2011 PLC(CS) 775
• SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN v. FIRST CAPITAL SECURITIES CORPORATION LIMITED 2011 PLD 778
• HAQ NAWAZ v. Haji GHULAM FARID 2011 SCMR 782
• GHULAM RASOOL v. AKBAR ALI 2011 SCMR 794
• FAQIR MUHAMMAD v. State 2011 PLD 796
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.10 OF 2011 v. Brutal Killing of a Youngman by Rangers 2011 PLD 799
• Syed HAROON ALI RIZVI v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2011 SCMR 801

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

registration advocate from Warah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes