Find a Lawyer

GHULAM NABI versus STATE

Section 345 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) All legal heirs of the deceased Qutel Ahmed compromised in the name of Allaah, when the accused was charged at the time of the incident. The agreement was voluntary and effective to promote harmony between the families, which was less than a year ago, in which case the Supreme Court accepted the request for a compromise between the parties and under this the accused was charged. Was acquitted of.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• ABDUL REHMAN v. State 2011 SCMR 965
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, LAHORE v. SHAFIQ TRADERS 2011 SCMR 967
• FAISAL MEHMOOD v. State 2011 SCMR 971
• RAB NAWAZ AHMED v. Mst. HASINA IQBAL 2011 SCMR 972
• MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2011 PLC(CS) 977
• CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE (now F.B.R.) v. RECKITT BENCKISER PAKISTAN LTD. 2011 SCMR 977
• THE STATE through Collector of Customs v. BASHIR KHAN 2011 SCMR 982
• Mian AURANGZEB v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Interio 2011 PLC(CS) 982

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

best advocate from Kotmomin lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes