Find a Lawyer

GHULAM QASIM versus STATE

Article 345 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 185 (3) The convict was convicted and executed by the lower courts during the murder of his brother on the charge of Qatil Ahmed Compromise. Listen. The accused's plea before the sides of the court was compromised and an application was granted for his approval. The deceased's legal heritage was compromised and the accused was genuine and without any pressure and agreement to apply. The permitted jail petition was turned into an appeal and the accused acquitted

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• SEZAI TURKES FEYZI AKKAYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (STFA) v. EKON YAPI ONARIM TICARET VE. SANAYI LTD. 2011 SCMR 1053
• RAEES KHAN v. State 2011 SCMR 1055
• MAQSOOD AHMAD v. State 2011 SCMR 1057
• MEHMOODUL HASSAN v. Mst. JANNAT 2011 SCMR 1059
• ABDUL KARIM v. Raja MUHAMMAD YOUNAS 2011 SCMR 1064
• MUHAMMAD HANAF v. MEMBER JUDICIAL-II, NOTIFIED OFFICER WITH POWERS OF CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 1067
• WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (WAPDA) through Chairman v. Dr. ALTAF-UR-REHMAN 2011 SCMR 1070
• Mst. FARHAT JABEEN v. MUHAMMAD SAFDAR 2011 SCMR 1073

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

law firms from Jaffarabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes