Find a Lawyer

WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (WAPDA) THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus DR. ALTAF-UR-REHMAN

RR 2 and 6 (b) (i) Work Chartered Employees For regular time scale grants Workplace service counting Scopework charged employee, although employed by WAPDA, WAPDA (Water Wing) Scientific Officers Could not avail of the service. The rules, 1980 said that the rules did not exclude the employee's ability to receive any benefits under it. Ten years of continuous service as mentioned in R6 (b) (i) of the Regulations and it was not qualified by the word \ regular word, irrespective of its nature in the Wapda water wing. Add Service \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2011

• MEHMOODUL HASSAN v. Mst. JANNAT 2011 SCMR 1059
• GHULAM QASIM v. State 2011 SCMR 1063
• ABDUL KARIM v. Raja MUHAMMAD YOUNAS 2011 SCMR 1064
• MUHAMMAD HANAF v. MEMBER JUDICIAL-II, NOTIFIED OFFICER WITH POWERS OF CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB 2011 SCMR 1067
• Mst. FARHAT JABEEN v. MUHAMMAD SAFDAR 2011 SCMR 1073
• MUHAMMAD AMIN v. CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION 2011 SCMR 1075
• SUO MOTU CASE NO. 24 OF 2010 v. (Regarding Corruption in Hajj Arrangements in 2010) 2011 PLC(CS) 1076
• SUDHEER AKHTAR v. State 2011 SCMR 1080

All Supreme Court judgments of 2011 →

criminal advocate from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes