MUHAMMAD TAHIR NASIM versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 170, 171, 153, 239 (10) and Schedule 1: Part III, Div III, CL (1A) and (b) Section RO 600 (I) / 91 Date 2 7 1991 Establishment of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 9 (2) (a) Reduction in the increase of 3% surplus of source tax on cotton lint filed on 5/7 ref 2011 in the Appellate Tribunal regarding the property On February 7, 2011, the Federal Tax Ombudsman's Office, two weeks after the matter became a Judicial Complaint, fell under section 9 (2) (a) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 Office. It was clear and strange that the first appeal was made by the authority The further delay in the issuance of your petition, the unavoidable purpose of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 was to rectify and correct the injustice done to taxpayers. Section 9 (2) (a) of the Establishment o f Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000, being of a technical nature, could not be allowed to defeat this purpose of law, the Income Tax Ordinance The right to receive compensation was also constituted under section 171 of 2001, the 2001 Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that the Federal Board of Revenue be returned to the Chief Commissioner within 21 days, in accordance with law and without prejudice to the appellate tribunal's decision. / Directs release of compensation.
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2012
