ANJUM SHAHBAZ versus EHTESAB BUREAU THROUGH CHAIRMAN/CHIEF PROSECUTOR EHTESAB BUREAU, MUZAFFARABAD
Section 11 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 409, 467, 468 and 471 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) misuse, fraudulent jurisdiction of the Accountability Court challenged Was alleged to have misused money. Employees of the School of Overseas Pakistani Foundation were neither in the service of the Azad Kashmir Government or the AJ Council nor were they serving the Azad Jammu Government or the Council, which was formed under a federal government. had gone. Law Overseas was a result of the Pakistani Legislature and established various working institutions in Pakistan, and employees of such institutions in Azad Kashmir were neither in the service of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir government nor the Council, though the school's Department of Education Was registered with Azad Jammu and Kashmir, so far, has said that there is no legal support for registration which is not in the service of the Azad Kashmir Government or the Council, nor to deal with the affairs of Jammu and Kashmir if it commits a crime. So, it can be investigated and prosecuted under the general constitutional rules, but not under the Accountability Act, which refers to a specific class of persons in which Azad Jammu is mentioned. And the Kashmir Accountability Act, 2007, which deals with persons in the service of the JJ&G Government or persons or associates of the Council of Public Office as provided under it or their associates in the above mentioned categories. Not all people involved, if they commit a crime, will be responsible. Accused appeals for consequences under common sentencing rules
