Article 199 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), criminal breach of trust on section 406 constitutional petition, terminating the FIR complainant was the tenant of the petitioner, against whom the controller's petition for rent ordered the withdrawal of the FIR. The FIR was filed, demanding the termination of the RR. The complainant's legal status was not accepted anywhere in the civil lawsuit and he did not personally issue a check in connection with the payment of the sale and the tenant was charged with a 4/2 year Later, the civil courts decided through FIR. Six months after the incident and six months after the filing of the civil case, it could not be filed that the allegations could not be justified on the basis of the record. Under the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court had sufficient powers to stop the prosecution of a criminal case, If no crime has been disputed. The parties were purely civil in nature, transformed into criminal proceedings with unconstitutional purposes where there were extenuating circumstances, under Article 199 of the Constitution or Section 61561A, CRPC The following options may be exercised; the High Court has granted the FIR against the applicant to be declared invalid.
