ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, F.B.R., LAHORE versus PRIME PVC FACTORY, MULTAN
Sections 2 (37), 3, 21, 36 and 47 Sales Tax General Order No. 03 of 2004 dated 12 6 2004, R39 (c) Tax fraud tax filing without registration tax period 17 3 2004 to 10 7 2005 Registered person shall be registered with the direction that he will be bound to register under the Sales Tax Act 1990, when his business exceeds Rs. 5 lakhs. Accused of non-payment of taxpayers while selling. Under the Sales Tax Act 1990, under different provisions of the Sales Tax Act 1990, the taxpayer was involved in tax fraud because he did not knowingly, fraudulently and dishonestly registered them and without sales tax registration. The fact that the taxpayers were claiming that the actual cost of delivering the tax was way above the threshold was still going on. That bank entries cannot be considered taxable. On the day when section 36 (1) of the Sales Tax Act 1990 was called when such showcase was issued, ie, on 2010 8, 2010 was banned from time to time. The Department had registered the taxpayers on 13-12 2004 as the sale was less than five million and was not responsible for payment of sales tax. In view of the bank accounts from 1 7 2004 to 30 2005, the decision making authority was Rs. 12,579,679 as against Rs. This period was limited to 30 6 2010. That, under Sales Tax General Order No. 03KR 39 (C) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, the Directorate General of Intelligence and Investigation personnel registered any of the Central Board with specific written permission.
