Securities 233 and 122 (5A) Brokerage and Commission Upper Front Commission The remaining commission taxpayers claimed that the residual commission falls within the scope of section (1) of section 233 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and based on its priorities Reviewed under the tax regime. Subsection (3) of section 233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, while subject to section 23 (2) of section 233 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the Upper Front Commission was not designated as section 233 (3) of the Income Tax Ordinance. The Ordinance, 2001 was provided for probable tax with respect to the receipts of only those commissions falling under sub-section (1) of section 233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, which is the entire income earned from the taxpayers of accuracy. Whether they fall within the purview of subsection (1). Or sub-section (2) of section 233 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, the commission of section 233 of the Income Tax Ordinance was Income Subsection (2), the amount of money held by the agent by the principal as commission or brokerage, 2001, The amount mentioned in section 23 (2) of section 233 of 2001 was hereby applied to all properties of the amount mentioned in the subsection. (1) Section 233 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and Section 233 of Section 233 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 were to be treated as an integral part of the amount mentioned. The revised assessment under section 122 (3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, and the reference to this assessment under section 122 (3) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, are incorrect on the first page of the order and so far Have to be Since it was prejudicial to interest the taxpayer's income that the taxpayer had fully executed his order approved under section 120 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001
