Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MEHBOOB BEG versus STATE


Supreme Court Rules, 1956, O. XXIV, r 2 Deletion of time limit and condolences for appeal for special leave in criminal matters, 17 days restriction on request and any explanation for delay in presentation with time restriction. Gone.

1971 S C M R 76

Present : Hamoodur Rahman, C. J., Muhammad Yaqub Ali

and Wahiduddin Ahmad, JJ

Mirza MEHBOOB BEG‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal NQ, K‑17 of 1970, d decided en 17th August 1970,

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Karachi Bench, Karachi, dated the 13th February 1970, in Criminal Appeal No. 84 of 1968).

Supreme Court Rules, 1956,

O. XXIV, r. 2‑Limitation and condonation of delay in petition for Special Leave to Appeal in criminal matters‑Petition barred by 17 days and no explanation for delay offered‑Petition dismissed as time‑barred.

Akhtar Mahmud Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Anwar Ali Syed, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing : 17th August 1970.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI, J.‑

This petition for leave to appeal from the order of a learned Judge in the High Court in a criminal matter is barred by 17 days.

In the application for condonation of delay, it is alleged that the petitioner had acted bona fide as he was away for a consider able time from Karachi where the appeal was heard and that he came to know of the order of dismissal of the appeal against conviction under section 409, P. P. C. read with section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 11 of 1947 only on 31‑3‑1970. The counsel who appeared in the High Court admittedly gave intimation to the petitioner about the judgment delivered in the case immediately. It was, therefore, the fault of the petitioner if he did not attend to the matter in time. In any case when the petitioner on his own showing received intimation of the order of the High Court on 31‑3‑1970 there is no explanation for delay in the institution of the petition for leave to appeal up to 14‑4‑1970.

The petition is dismissed as barred by time.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Thari Mirwah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.