C.I.R., R.T.O., SUKKUR versus STAR LINK COMMUNICATION, PROPRIETOR M. RAHEEL, SUKKUR
In addition to the statements made under section 122 (4), 221, 120, 170, 177 (4), 114, 115 (4) and section 115 (4) of the 113A Income Tax Ordinance, returns were filed under the Act. 2001 and asserts that the tax refund tax officer corrected the order treating all receipts under tax reform, the First Appellate Authority declared this correction order illegal, invalid and invalid and ordered the test Restored and directed to issue a refund after checking the tax evidence. The taxpayer was withheld and then the case was selected for modification of the order under section 122 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and the taxpayer's calculation of payable tax equal to the amount returned. Will apply to The precise information for the audit was selected on the basis of, but no such final notice was stated in the order passed by the Tax Officer First Appellate Eight and Tatty observed that similar facts had previously been applied by the Appellate Authority and The Appellate Tribunal had already argued in the first round of litigation, the tax officer was not deemed justified in amending the order. The first appellate authority had rightly rejected the tax order. ? The First Appellate Authority's officer order was upheld and the appeal filed by the department was dismissed by the appellate tribunal \ r \ n
