CH. ABDULLAH YOUSAF versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, PUNJAB
Sections 56,,, & 65 & 67 67 Notification No. F (()) / C 85 Cards, Dated 16 198 3 1985 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Testimony of Election Controversy, Types of Disputes by Election Applicants The witnesses were about to be summoned. The retired candidate was the only one who could record the testimony of the witness whose affidavit was attached to the election justification In the present case, there were only two types of witnesses, one private and the other a public witness, the private witness was the one who filed the filing. At the time of the election petition, the control of the applicant was within the control and reach of the applicant and the person who intended to dispose of the realistic aspect of the dispute raised in the election petition included persons who were present at the time of the election petition. Applicants were not in direct control and access. At the time of the recording of the evidence, it is deemed necessary for the witness to appear before him, so that some of the records kept in his secret secret organizations, and were sought by law enforcement, to appear as witnesses, in relation to the private witnesses. The affidavit was required to provide the affidavit, while in connection with the official testimony, it was necessary to be met only by the election applicant. A list of official witnesses with an election request justifying their production and documents, which were required to be proved by any type of witnesses, the Election Tribunal called for any witness The powers to do so, even if it was in the list of witnesses, was not named if such witnesses needed an Election Tribunal and their conviction.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
