C.I.R., L.T.U., ISLAMABAD versus HASEEB ESTATE BUILDERS, ISLAMABAD
Sections 111 (1) (a), 122 (5) (9) and 120 Unclear income or asset uncertainty Inquiries related to fisheries Bank credit transactions were added by treating credit transactions appearing in three accounts. The first appellate authority, however, claimed that the appellate authority was not allowed to admit the new evidence under section 128 (5) of the First Income Tax Ordinance 2001. And the First Appellate Authority did not provide any reasons for the order to be vacated. The validity officer simply took the wristband by inserting entries and adding money without proving the exact nexus of the sales transaction. The tax officer did not need any fishing inquiries, nor did the taxpayers' business receipts have any positive role in the economy, without solid evidence proving the alliance. The result of the increase in treasury was the capital flight from the country. Open diagnosis was made in the dark by grappling / investigating and issuing repeated notices and making fishing inquiries. The legal flaw in the assessment was clear and the non-negotiable Assisi explained all the deposits and in accordance with the earlier satisfaction indicated inappropriate discrepancies in his account. Appellate Authority Against No Reasonable Arguments The assessment provided in the law order presented by the initial appellate authority was not strictly complied with, and the appellate tribunal did not consider the merits to be appealed.
