MOULVI SHAHZADO DREHO versus SYED KHURSHEED AHMED SHAH
A. XXXIII, RR 1, 3 and O VII, R 11 Constitution of Pakistan, Art 199 Constitutional application for dismissal of the plaintiff's application as a legal remedy for dismissal for inappropriate litigation as a pharma pauperis scope suit. Disclaimer and Payment of Court Fees Authorized by the court for further proceedings, the petitioner, under R11, wishes to reject the plaintiff's request on the basis of CPC that O XXXIII, R 3 , Is equivalent to quashing the cause of action based on the plaintiff's dismissal under CPC. It had filed the case against the applicant through the court, but the amendment has been accepted by the court as payment of judicial fees on legal terms under Rule 1 XXXIII, Rr 1 & 5 Will be limited to receiving exceptions. The proceedings for the institutional suit under CPC and both the reasons for permitting or permitting an application under 0XXXIII are separate features of the CPC, cannot be added due to payment of court fees. Prior to the filing of the case in the regular file, the two had requested an extension due to a reduction in fee from the court after the request for action to meet various mandatory requirements, according to which the plaintiff's The court fee paid was allowed. The extended time will have the same effect and power as the first time such fee was paid, the reviewing court dismissed the wrong idea, directing the High Court to decide the case on merit. The unclean order was set aside.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
