MUHAMMAD ASHRAF SANGRI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 7 Rules for Competitive Examination (CSS) 2010, R18 Leadership Competition 2008, R6 (F) Competitive Examination Candidate for Candidate (s) Due to Failure of Vivo Voice Only I attended Despite having achieved a high score in written tests and a medical examination or psychological evaluation, the successful applicant was declared unsuccessful for any reason, three members of the board and the chairman under Viva voce. Two members passed the appellant, while one member and the chairman declared them unsuccessful when the full record of both the educational and extra wall was present with the commission during the viva voce and questioned the appellant on the issue of common interest. Was intended to evaluate the suit for this service. He enrolled for the highest score on the written exam and passed all the other exams, which we are mainly qualified for as a civil service, chairman and a member for his qualification. And attitude, personality was planned, did not use discretion in the manner of the chairman of the competitive examination and the member had to look at the overall performance. Regarding the appellant, this was not the case with the appellant's chairman, and during the appellant's examination, the member did not use the discretion in the manner he should have used, R6 (F) violation. Competitive Examination, ??? for and Considering Applicant's Overall Performance
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
