AVARI HOTELS LIMITED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, INFORMATION AND BROADCASTING
Section 33 of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Rules 2002, R2 (e) and 2 (1) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), and VIII, R11 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), sections 42 and 56 of the Suite Declaration for. In a notice issued by the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA), the plaintiff has demanded that he get a license for cable television (CTV) at his hotel, the plaintiff claimed that he was on CTV. The operator does not make sense because he was not broadcasting via transfer and / or broadcasting. Channels specific to his hotels under section 42 and 56 (d) (i) (J) of the Relief Act, 1877 Order, on the plaintiff's notice under OVII, R 11, CPC The accused has been charged under the alleged notices. Appeal Court to decide whether to reject a trial hearing to decide whether the plaintiff was a transmitter and / or through a broadcaster head end or engaged in the transmission or transmission of audio-visual programs. Cables or MMDS, and whether such services were brought under the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance 2002 and the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Rules, 2002 trial court as a result of the interim injunction. Appellant was providing hotel management services to his guests; therefore, he was not involved in the delivery and distribution of programs to consumers, but was using TV channels to ensure the availability of programs to his guests, Appellant. The court's jurisdiction for this declaration To Currency
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
