Section 15 (2) (vii) Rules of the Sindh Chief Court (O Section), RR 105, 106 and 107 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application for removal of tenants by the rent controller refusing to accept the proceedings of the previous order order. The former parties have approved the dismissal order. Against the tenant, because he did not knowingly enter into action. Belfort's legitimate statement shows that the tenant's sons expressly refused to accept the court notice, and such refusal under the law provided the tenant with all the opportunity to secure his interest in the matter. Had to give It was also made but the tenant did not proceed, whatever was claimed by the landlord, was refused and the tenant had no choice but to leave the former parties and the bay. Should the order of interference be passed, the tenant was aware of the matter and was watching it closely and under the surgery that he could delay the proceedings and once the order was approved, he would come up with the request. Such a thing is not in their knowledge. DG But she failed in her predictions and plans, information on the case or any other affidavit to support the affidavit requesting a pretrial order was not stated. And in such cases the controller of the rent intentionally and knowingly and dismissed his request under the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court kept himself out of the case despite service, dismissing the petition in the cases. Done.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
