GHULAM HUSSAIN MEMON versus SHAH ABDUL LATIF EDUCATION THROUGH HONORARY SECRETARY
The plaintiff plaintiffs' trust for the claim of a section 92 and OVII, R11 constitution Pakistan, Article 199 constitutional petition and permanent injunction have decided to close the shops offered to the plaintiff, the plaintiff stated in the trust. The plaintiff's decision was rejected. It was claimed by the court below that the case was targeted under section 92, the CPC's Validity Plaintiff filed a lawsuit solely to protect her tenancy rights and she filed the trust's existence. Was not challenged nor asked for any relief for the approval of the Advocate General's Defendant's trust in it. The circumstances were not required before the case was filed; in the case filed by the plaintiff there was a clear distinction between the provisions of Claims and Section 2, CPC, for the protection and administration of trusts constituted for public purpose. Was designed and requires consent. In the present case, before the case was filed for obtaining the Advocate General Order, the plaintiff had filed a case for protection of his right that without the law he could not be expelled from the shop. And for this purpose he approached the court, and the court granted such relief by instructing the defendant not to interfere with the plaintiff's business and to not expel him from the premises without the law's prohibition and such. The appeal was also dismissed by the Court of Appeal against the order. The appellate court below misunderstood that the plaintiff's case falls under section 92, the CPC decision was set aside and the cases were remanded to the trial court for remand on merit. Decide
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
