Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 395 and 215, gifted to assist in the recovery of stolen property, were further investigated against the accused, saying that they had taken the complainant's new car. Lee was transported to his destination while the work was in progress, and when the complainant contacted the accused on his mobile phone, they demanded a ransom, which was partially paid by the complainant, but the robbery car was never Was not returned and correctly filed FIR twenty-two (22) days late and explain any compelling or convincing circumstances to the complainant. , Which prevented him from filing an FIR immediately, except for the argument that he had tried to resolve the dispute himself after the defendants had made part of the ransom payment, The names of the two accused were mentioned in the FIR but they did not affect the recovery of the alleged stolen car, the complainant mentioned in the FIR that he contacted the accused on their movements. Did the phone number but the number was not mentioned in the FIR and it was not told how the complainant knew the accused and his mobile One obtains number One in his bail plea, the accused had identified the business enmity between the parties, but the fact was not stated in the FIR by the complainant, the complainant alleged that the traders were compensated. Some part of the hotel was paid for, but no hotel was named in the FIR. The complainant allegedly contacted the accused himself and received one
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
