Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

THE WORKMEN OF WEST PAKISTAN IRRIGATION WORKSHOP\' HYDERABAD versus THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN IRRIGATION AND POWER, LAHORE


West Pakistan Industrial Conflict Ordinance 1968 The West Pakistan Industrial Conflict Ordinance (ITS of 1968) and the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968) Department of Public Works Department, which employs the Department of Government, Nevertheless, such laws are not legalized. West Pakistan will not exclude the industrial dispute ordinance request. 1968 Such fairs only apply to the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance under 1968 under the authority of the provincial government on applicable industrial and commercial enterprises. I'm not. Principles of governing workers in the commercial establishment of the provincial government-controlled industrial estate.

1971 P L C 134

[Sind Labour Appellate Tribunal]

Present: Inamullah Khan, Appellate Tribunal

THE WORKMEN OF WEST PAKISTAN IRRIGATION WORKSHOP'

HYDERABAD

Versus

THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN

IRRIGATION AND POWER, LAHORE AND 2 OTHERS

Appeal No. HYD-127 of 1970, decided on 12th 'September 1970.

West Pakistan Industrial Disputes Ordinance (ITS of 1968)

and West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)-Public Works Department Manual containing rules governing workmen of Department, notwith standing such rules being statutory--Does not exclude application of West Pakistan. Industrial Disputes Ordinance; 1968-Such miles exclude application of only West Pakistan Industrial and Commer cial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968--Provisions of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance-Not applicable industrial and commercial establishments carried on by or under authority of Provincial Government-Such statutory rules governing workmen in industrial land commercial establishment run by Provincial Government cannot exclude jurisdiction of Labour Court-Labour Court, -held, compe tent to adjudicate and determine industrial dispute in such estab lishments.

A. Majeed for Appellant.

Ghayasuddin Farooqi, Superintending Engineer and Khan Mohammad A. Pario, Executive Engineer for Respondent No. 2.

Date of hearing: 3rd September 1970.

ORDER

After careful and anxious consideration, I have come to the conclusion that the Irrigation Department Workshop, Jamshoro; reasons to be given later on, is an Industrial Establishment within the meaning of the West Pakistan Industrial Disputes Ordinance, 1968, and that even if public Works Department Manual containing Rules governing the workmen of Jamshoro Workshop are Statutory Rules, it will only exclude the application of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders). Ordinance, 1963 and not the application of the West Pakistan. Industrial Disputes, Ordinance, 1968. Wherever, Statutory Rules exist is respect of Industrial and Commercial Establishment carried on by or, under the' authority of the Provincial Government, the Standing Orders will not apply. There is a difference between the Standing Orders and the Indus trial Disputes Ordinance. By the former, the Government though fit to regulate, in respect of certain matters, conditions o service of workmen in Industrial Organizations, while under the latter power has been conferred on Industrial Courts to adjudicat upon industrial disputes. The Court's power under the Industrial Disputes Ordinance to adjudicate and determine industrial disputes is very wide and extensive to resolve industrial dispute and restore peace.

2. The industrial dispute arose in 1968. -It would not now be proper to send back the case for adjudication: by the Industrial Court. Several hundred industrial disputes are pending adjudication before the Labour Court. The Labour Court would not be in a position to give priority to this case. I have, therefore, decided to dispose of the industrial dispute myself, having the same power as the Industrial Court, as soon as possible.

3. Mr. A. Majeed, the learned Representative for the appellant, has dropped Demand No. 2, relating to the application of Factories Act to the Workshop. He is directed to file affidavits in respect of the other three demands. The affidavits should be concise and to the point. He must hand over a copy of the affidavit t or affidavits 'to the other side, who' can file rejoinder if they so desire.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Mingora lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.