HUMAYUN AKHTAR JALIL versus CAPITAL ONE EQUITIES LIMITED
Under the agreement between the parties X-XIII, R3 and Section 151, the jurisdiction to refuse the enforcement of any legal agreement to the jurisdiction of the parties to refuse the execution of such agreement between the parties There was a choice, which I wondered whether it would be implemented. If unfair or acting gross injustice affects the court, it will not enforce any agreement, either be void on its face or be invalidated on the basis of non-contentious / recognized facts, e.g. That O XXIII will be used in the last part of R 3. The CPC will not be read because it is necessary for the court to pass a decision on the basis of a legal agreement, essentially and mechanically, but it can be interpreted as a softening An order can be refused based on a legal agreement. The rule would be the exception rather than the rule
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
