Abuse of Sections 9 (a) (iv) and 32 Powers of Definition of Evidence In the decision of the Standing Committee Trial Court, the culprits were punished for their misuse of powers and no witness was presented to prove that The accused's term of employment is in violation of the terms and conditions of the notification in the allotment questions, and the decision of the standing committee prosecutor based on his allegations. Two documents, namely the Standing Committee's notification and decision, but both documents were neither presented nor presented before the trial court, so the basic documents by which the allegations could be proved are missing from the record. They could, only on specific demand, present. The notification before the High Court Prosecution failed to prove the charges against the accused and the accused were acquitted, in which the appeal was allowed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
