Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus STATE

The defendants admit that the section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Articles 302/324/34/109 murder, attempt to perform a fine of murder, joint intent, free bail, delay in the end of trial More than two years and seven months have passed but their case has not been forwarded, and the delay was not due to the accused persons. Given that the delay was not attributed to the accused, the prosecutor admitted that the culprits had not been sentenced to death or life imprisonment. Or stiff or that he was disappointed or had been declared a dangerous offender or accused of the death penalty or life imprisonment under any act of terrorism on them. Delay in the end of his trial

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• CAPTAIN PQ CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. VITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARACHI 2012 YLR 1734
• ADAM SUGAR MILLS LIMITED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Commerce 2012 CLD 1734
• AL-ABID SILK MILLS LTD. v. KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. 2012 CLC 1738
• GHUFRAN AHMED v. State 2012 MLD 1744
• ARSHAD v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1749
• ESTATE AND ASSETS OF LATE ABDUL GHANI 2012 YLR 1752
• FAUJI OIL TERMINAL AND DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. v. PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division, Islamabad 2012 PTD 1762
• ABBAS ALI v. ASIF ABBAS 2012 CLC 1762

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

patent advocate from Sudhnoti lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes