Find a Lawyer

ESTATE AND ASSETS OF LATE ABDUL GHANI versus

Section 72 Application Application Request for Succession Certificate After approval of the succession miscellaneous application, the amount was split into applicant (wife) and two legal heirs. The petitioner's son and daughter confessed that the son was not the real son of the deceased applicant because his name was not stated in the affidavit's wife's affidavit before the government liability son. For the purpose of DNA testing directed to appear with the hospital applicant to find out if he was the applicant's real son and entitled to a succession amount. And said the test costs were to be paid to the applicant

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• AL-ABID SILK MILLS LTD. v. KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. 2012 CLC 1738
• GHUFRAN AHMED v. State 2012 MLD 1744
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. State 2012 MLD 1748
• ARSHAD v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1749
• FAUJI OIL TERMINAL AND DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. v. PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division, Islamabad 2012 PTD 1762
• ABBAS ALI v. ASIF ABBAS 2012 CLC 1762
• MUNAWAR ALI JATOI v. State 2012 MLD 1763
• ABDUL KHALIQUE v. 4TH CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KHAIRPUR 2012 PCrLJ 1770

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

how to become a advocate from Astore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes