Sections 497 (2) and 103 of the Convention, Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 409/419/420/468/471/109/477 Criminal breach of trust by a public servant, deception by personality, fraud and dishonesty. The benefit of suspecting fraudulently supplying property, fraudulent documents, forgery as fake documents, forgery of accounts, forgery of further investigation, suspicion of illegal and fraudulent documents stolen from a company's bank account The accused and the co-accused, who were bank employees, were released from custody, the names of the suspects were not included in the FIR and N Yes, they were assigned a special role. At the time of recovery, the police made no attempt to secure the counselors from the public, which was in violation of section 103, CR P 0 and the date shown in the arrest and confiscation memo. The recovery of time was made suspicious, which revealed that at the time of recovery of cash from the accused's house, the co-accused was already ith the investigating agency, which created the suspicion. The investigating agency searched the accused's house and recovered the cash. But, strangely, the suspect was not arrested, which led to suspicion, which had to go to the accused during the bail period. The recovered cash was not sealed on the case Need further investigation from the case The accused and the accused were released on bail accordingly.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
