Section 1 561 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 420/468/471/34 Fraudulent and dishonest property use, as a forged document, to be used as a forged document Karun, in order to cancel the order with a joint intention, had obtained financial assistance (loan) from the applicant / applicant bank against which he had provided a commercial building as commercial / security on the plot. The Complaint Bank provided the bank with photocopies of several other immovable property documents owned by it, to show its potential. The Financial Conduct Bank then sent a letter to the sub-registrar stating that such immovable property was purchased by the complainant from the bank's financial services and he implemented the declaration in the name of the bank, Therefore, no transfer process was registered. Such immovable properties were to be accepted by the bank complainant without issue with the objection certificate N (NOC). On the investigation report submitted by the accused (bank officials) and the police under Section 173, CR PC, the magistrate agreed with the police report and approved the FIR "B \ Class" because the complainant's opinion It was that the investigating officer was primarily based on his handwriting expert's findings. The report in relation to the seal of the complainant's signatures, declarations and seals, which the Magistrate admits mechanically without acknowledging that such report was contested by the expert. The FIR was directly charged with the commission of fraud, which they called fraudulent contracts.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
