Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 337H (2), 452 and 149 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Qatl e amd, hurt by harassment or neglect act from home. Prior to the arrest of corruption and terrorism, the grants of four accomplices were granted bail by the trial court, which allegedly broke KK on a police constable. And the suspect was attributed to the same character that was in the FIR. During the trial, it was yet to be proved that one of the men, who allegedly threw KK over the constable, was also included. And because of this, there was eye witness in his statement under Section 161, CR PC. Not supported by prosecution case. His statement was recorded after a delay of one month and four days. The injured person had also pardoned the accused in his affidavit. Other statements by the prosecution have not disclosed that the complainant was not present at the house or at the scene during the incident, neither the state counsel nor Controversial or contradictory counsel for the complainant stated that the position of the facts is generally one of further bail inquiry, unless there are other compelling reasons to come to a different conclusion. All said such important questions would require further investigation to prove the crime of the accused. Even at the bail phase, the interim bail given to the accused was confirmed, under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012