Find a Lawyer

MUHBAT ALIAS AZAM versus STATE

During the attempt to commit Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 Qatil Ahmed bail, a further inquiry was made by the police during the grant of the co-accused, who was designated with the accused in the FIR. Had left it. Such an investigation enabled the suspect's case to fit in, which required further investigation, especially when the case was ineffective, as no one was hurt because of the alleged shootings. In these situations, however

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• ALL PAKISTAN NEWSPAPERS SOCIETY v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 PLD 129
• ENGRO VOPAK TERMINAL LTD. v. PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance, Islamabad 2012 PTD 130
• BROOKES PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES (PAKISTAN) LTD., KARACHI v. KARACHI BUILDINGS CONTROL AUTHORITY (KBCA) 2012 CLC 131
• DANISH CORPORATION through Proprietor v. GHULAM HUSSAIN 2012 MLD 132
• TIPU SULTAN KHAN v. INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (IBA) 2012 MLD 137
• NIB BANK LTD. v. DEWAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD. 2012 CLD 141
• ASGHAR KHAN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 142
• Syed ABID ALI v. GHULAM MOINUDDIN KHAN 2012 CLC 143

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

advocate from Jhand lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes