Find a Lawyer

NIB BANK LTD. versus DEWAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD.

Sections 9 and 10, defending the bank loan collection lawsuit, did not refuse to seek financing and claimed that the financing facility was extended in 2007, prior to that. The financing was nothing but a renewal and the defendant never agreed. Such reorganization was always the amount accepted and recognized by the lenders and did not include any kind of reorganization that was separate and distinct from the financial treasury, where the borrower's The reorganization of responsibility was one of housing and development that was raised by the financial institution. The leave was not sought in any way and the suit was dismissed by the defendant in order to defend the case \ r \ nThe suit was dismissed.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• BROOKES PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES (PAKISTAN) LTD., KARACHI v. KARACHI BUILDINGS CONTROL AUTHORITY (KBCA) 2012 CLC 131
• DANISH CORPORATION through Proprietor v. GHULAM HUSSAIN 2012 MLD 132
• MUHBAT alias AZAM v. State 2012 YLR 133
• TIPU SULTAN KHAN v. INSTITUTE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (IBA) 2012 MLD 137
• ASGHAR KHAN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 142
• Syed ABID ALI v. GHULAM MOINUDDIN KHAN 2012 CLC 143
• Syed MUDDASSIR ALI RIZVI v. NAJEEB MALIK 2012 MLD 145
• Haji ZANGI KHAN v. Mst. SAEEDA KHATOON 2012 YLR 145

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

jobs for advocates from Haveli Lakha lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes