Sections 3 and 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 435 and 439 of the Unlawful Disposal Complaint / Applicants alleged that their flat was illegally and illegally by the defendants in their absence. Has been acquitted, defendants' trial has been excluded from litigation claims. It was that he obtained the flat in question by contracting the sale with the complainant, providing sufficient evidence that the respondents had been legally occupying the flat since 2004 on the basis of legal documents. The Unlawful Dispossession Act, 2005, when the legal possession came into existence, was not evidenced by the complainant for proving that the flat was illegally occupied by the respondents. , There is no allegation that the complainant was unlawfully expelled, either before they came into operation or The power of the Act Case after the coming of the Act is not covered under the provisions of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005. No interference has been sought from the High Court after an order was passed on the correct definition of law.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
